"Proficient delayers"

I just finished reading Brent Waters' book From Human to Posthuman: Christian Theology and Technology in a Posthuman World. In my opinion, its greatest strength lies in its analysis of the language of posthuman theology that tries to replace God with creativity. The creativity that posthumanism worships is one of infinite self re-creation that knows (it thinks) no limits. The holy grail of that pursuit is immortality, but Waters shows clearly how that immortality is not to be equated with eternity.

"Even if we grant that the posthuman dream of virtual immortality is feasible rather than fanciful, its twofold strategy of radical transformation fails, for the problem of finite and temporal necessity is not overcome, but merely displaced and denied. In the first instance, independence from ecological processes is achieved by shifting human dependence from nature to artifice. In deploying technology to become progressively less dependent on natural processes, humans will be using artifacts of their own design, and therefore subject to their control. Yet the eventual success of the posthuman project is predicated on the evolution of artificial life that is superior to humans, and therefore not under their control. Dependence is not so much overcome as displaced; natural necessity is exchanged for an artificial counterpart. [. . .] posthumans are ultimately not the masters of their own fate, but only proficient delayers."

This is so very true. And although Waters does not go on to argue this point, it strikes me with a new force (as it did Jonathan Swift and many other writers) that immortality on human terms (vis a vis human control) is not necessarily good, and may even be fundamentally bad. And yet our technophiles go on working for it, freezing their heads and hoping to live into the future that they think is going to be so very luminous.